Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (7877)	5/16/2000 4:20:00 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10354

Paid Consultant Goelo of TRIM, thank you for your kind words. BTW, cant wait to get a copy of your lawsuit you have with TRIMFAST. Are you know the x paid consultant?

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (7877)	5/18/2000 8:37:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10354

FG 666 you are a scummy tout: "Ragingbull TRIM ragingbull.com TRIM - TRIMFAST GROUP INC tenkwizard.com. TRIMFAST GROUP INC filed this 10SB12G/A on 03/13/2000. registration provided in Section 4(2) of the Act. We believed section 4(2) was available because there was no general solicitation or advertising used in connection with the offering and the transaction did not involve a public offering. In July of 1999, we issued warrants to purchase 68,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for consulting services. Of these, 18,000 were issued to Francois Goelo and are exercisable on any date until July 26,2000 at a price of $4.00 per share.The remaining 50,000 were issued to Sal Russo and are exercisable on any date until July 29, 2000 at a price of $4.00 per share. These warrants were issued without registration in reliance on the exemption from registration provided in Section 4(2) of the Act. We believed section 4(2) was available because there wa

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (7877)	5/19/2000 10:18:00 AM
From: StockDung	Respond to of 10354

By: frisky Reply To: 21065 by Lester4 Friday, 19 May 2000 at 8:32 AM EDT Post # of 21082 LOL, ZSUN did not own OIA until March 25, 2000. OIA accounts for 85% to 90% of ZSUN's revenues. Comparing the revenues of the first quarter of 2000 with those of the first quarter of 1999 is comparing apples with oranges. Touts love to fool the imbeciles. Since the imbeciles cannot tell the difference between the EBITDA EPS and the diluted EPS, ZSUN loves to show them the earnings before tax depreciation and amortization . All the mainstream companies in the Wall Street always report diluted EPS (after interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) instead of EBITDA EPS. Another trick is to book the goodwill and additional paid-in capital for rewarding former OIA shareholders on March 31, 2000. Therefore, no additional goodwill was amortized in the first quarter of 2000. ZSUN bragged that it had $124,880,579 shareholders? equity. They did not tell the imbeciles that it booked $115 million goodwill to create the illusion of huge shareholders? equity. Only the former OIA shareholders are the beneficiaries of the goodwill. BTW, you must deduct $6,000,000 cash that ZSUN will pay the former OIA shareholders in the second quarter.

To: Francois Goelo who wrote (7877)	5/22/2000 11:25:00 AM
From: who cares?	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10354

Ahoy hoy lowly mortals. smarch.com I, Charles Montgomery Burns, the man that brought you the Burns Omni-Net, and who captured the adorable Loch Ness monster Nessie, have been hard at work compiling a list of the many scummy things ZSUN and it's touts have done since it's inception. I will begin posting these tomorrow and will continue until I have one of my unpredictable changes of heart. I welcome any and all scum tout or legit ZSUN long to argue the other side of any of my post in a polite, constructive, manner. That is all, you may now return to what you call a life, perhaps checking your stock quotes. smarch.com CMB