Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (56373)	5/16/2000 4:52:00 PM
From: scheherezadesdance	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Wolff deleted the post but I copy and pasted it in one of mine. The question for me is NOT one of whether the receipt was a forged receipt that you made up. The question is whether it is a false receipt because you didn't donate the money. I suspect that this won't be the end of this story if you did not donate that money.

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (56373)	5/16/2000 5:04:00 PM
From: knows_picker	Respond to of 122087

5K-1 downward departures are very rarely granted and the mandatory minimum is determined by guidelines in the statute. Within the guideline the Judge has some latitude based on the PSI. The Probation Office prepares a Document (PSI) which gives an objective view of ALL FACTS (usually VERY SLANTED). Anthony received the MINIMUM allowed by law. Had there been no madatory minimum what might the judge have given him? WHAT THE JUDGE BELIEVED TO BE JUST. Im guessing less.