SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scheherezadesdance who wrote (56441)5/16/2000 9:55:00 PM
From: Jay Fisk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
From #13722833

"You do understand that in some cases the officials are contacting the posters"

"they are "after" Tony"

You have exactly two choices after these comments:

1. Retract these comments as conjecture, or

2. Set yourself up for willful interference in an ongoing investigation.

Your choice, not mine.



To: scheherezadesdance who wrote (56441)5/16/2000 10:01:00 PM
From: who cares?  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
Mary has a huge right to ask about the charity since she helped. Until you can show where it's any concern of your I don't see that you have that right. If it hinders you in following Tony's stock advice then gee, pretty simple, don't follow it. If you are this concerned about it, why not start a "Let's pry into Tony's personal business" thread and leave this one to discussion of shorts.
Again you allude to all of this behind the scenes stuff that is going on with authorities contacting posters. Gee what authorities? I won't even ask you to identify which posters, but surely you could say which person representing what law enforcement agency is contacting people. After all this would not be top secret classified info. there's no reason not to make it public. In fact to use your own way of thinking, if you get the agency and officer's contact info out here, maybe others will contact said mystery agency and come up with the smoking gun. Unless of course this mystery agency exists only in the space between your tympanic membranes.

As for whether you were in court or not, I would lean toward the not, or you wouldn't misinterpret Wolff's post the way you are trying to. Then again, maybe you would.

CMB



To: scheherezadesdance who wrote (56441)5/16/2000 11:13:00 PM
From: Bear Down  Respond to of 122087
 
You do understand that in some cases the officials are contacting the posters. You should understand by the effort that took place on this charity issue that they are "after" Tony.

Afre you saying you have knowledge of an ongoing conspiracy by the US government to go "after" an individual?

Don't you think you should report such behavior after the holier than thou attitude you have been displaying? Or is it OK for the government to use taxpayer dollars to go "after" people in your mind? You seem to have a deranged set of values