Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sandintoes who wrote (2887)	5/17/2000 9:01:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3246

Thank you for the effort. That is a somewhat different issue, though it may be connected to kick- backs, of course. The accusation is that cronies of the president were given preferential treatment in the acquisition of privatized assets. The likelihood is that this was done primarily for political support, rather than financial gain. Although corrupt, it is not quite the same as pilfering, since the assets were generally put to productive uses. Rather, it is like insider trading, gaining advantage over competitors through special relationships. I respect Solzhenitsyn, but he is somewhat reactionary about capitalism and modern Western society, and therefore is not wholly reliable as a source of information on the issue. Anyway, the grant of immunity, even if wrong, has effectively ensured that a full accounting of wrongdoing will not occur, and therefore that we may never quite know what went on. I say "if wrong" because it is arguable that, at this point in Russian life, the political chaos that would attend such probes would make them dangerous, as opponents of democracy use allegations to discredit the last decade........