SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Citrix Systems (CTXS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MikeM54321 who wrote (8081)5/17/2000 9:55:00 PM
From: Heeren Pathak  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9068
 
Mike,

The key statement in that paragraph is:

Our clients now tell us "Why do we need Citrix anymore when we plan on implementing the web-based model?" There is no perfect rebuttal to that concern.

The conclusion listed there is correct. There is no perfect rebuttal to that concern. There are a lot of factors that would go into the choice of Citrix vs. Web-based solution. These are listed below:

o New vs. Existing. If one is developing a new app, using web-based technology could be a compelling choice since there is a lower cost of deployment.

o Development Expertise. Does the company have web-based development expertise? Finding, hiring, and retaining good web developers is tough. It is easier and cheaper to find VB developers which would lean one towards a Citrix solution.

o Cost of Development. For small - medium sized apps, developing web-based apps is more expensive than non-web based apps. This is due to having very robust RAD tools like Visual Basic. Once again, this could lean towards Citrix.

o Cost of deployment. For a large number of users, Citrix is an expensive solution relative to a web-based one.

o Security. Citrix provides a better security model since you can bake it into the server.

o Scalibility. A web-based solution scales better and has more options for scaling than Citrix.

o Interactivity. How interactive does the application have to be? A Citrix app is far more interactive than a web-based one. Things like drag and drop, printing, etc. are difficult from a web-based app compared to a Citrix app.

o Usability. My friends that are Human Factors people go nuts with what they view as significant usability declines forced upon users as web-based apps are implemented. If usability is important, a Citrix solution may be a better choice.

I could probably go on, but I think the list paints the picture. As you can see, the decision is going to be made on a case by case basis. Currently, the pie is big enough that all boats will rise. However in the long term, Citrix never dominate the PC-based thin client market. Web-based technology is good enough for enough apps to block Citrix.

I beleive Citrix will need to find better areas to focus on. The company has been very good at doing this to date and I think they have already started laying the foundation for another switch. That is why I am looking at what they are doing in the wireless and embedded spaces. The technology is a good fit in that space and there are limitations that will make existing web-based approaches non ideal for building applications.

Heeren