Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chip McVickar who wrote (1624)	5/17/2000 2:06:00 PM
From: YxY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

So may be we have to agree on what is a wiggle first..The wiggle date in the test is the day 3 of the wiggle so for IBM on day 2 the high (119.75) is higher than the high on day 1 (118.81). Same with JPM. Did I miss something? As for the sell wiggle I guess you have to reverse low and high and switch above with below in the definition?

To: Chip McVickar who wrote (1624)	5/17/2000 6:22:00 PM
From: Dan Duchardt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

Chip, YxY, anyone This is a variation on the 3 day buy wiggle....2nd day is not complete...2nd must have a higher high then the first day and close lower. Close lower than what? I've assumed that it meant close lower than the close of day1. I don't see this being satisfied in the Nasdaq futures mentioned a few days back. Message 13714848 commoditiesfutures.com According to my data service, day2 didn't even close lower than it opened, and closed above day1's close. I do see some overlap; day2 low is below day1 high, but I don't think that's the criterion. What am I missing? Dan