SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jay Couch who wrote (34330)5/18/2000 2:26:00 PM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
Always assume innocence until proven otherwise (even with professional athletes). It's what our legal system is based on, supposedly.

I thought maybe an update on applicable legal principles would be helpful. The presumption of innocence, once a cornerstone of our legal system, was gradually repealed in a series of court decisions throughout the latter part of the century just ended. These cases culminated in the seminal case, People of the State of California vs. Simpson (Los Angeles County), in which the presumption of innocence was entirely replaced by the concept that guilt and innocence are wholly irrelevant. All cases will henceforth be decided based upon the personal biases of the jurors without regard to arcane concepts of "evidence".

In a separate line of cases, athletes and celebrities have successfully lobbied for disparate treatment from the rest of the teeming masses. In some circumstances, this permits liberties with underage babysitters and other females despite the morally repugnant nature of such behavior. See, for example, People of the State of Someplace Out East vs. Kelsey Grammer.

Finally, in 1999 a series of cases replaced the presumption of innocence for professional football players with the "one felon" rule. Each professional team is now expected to have at least one actively practicing felon on the roster at all times. Teams that fail to comply with this requirement are subject to penalties ranging from lowering of draft position to additional gratuitous "personal foul" penalties at key points in playoff games.

Hope this helps,

MAD DOG

Legaladviceforfreeandwortheverypenny.com



To: Jay Couch who wrote (34330)5/18/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: mph  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
I'm perfectly happy to presume innocence.

My point was that, if his intentions were
indeed honorable, and therefore he is innocent,
the decision to place himself in that position
was stupid.

So he's either innocent and stupid or guilty.
I'll give him the presumption of innocence and stupidity.

M