Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (4386)	5/18/2000 9:31:00 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Respond to of 5853

All good points. I just wish that the market had dealt with the problem instead of the Feds. The Feds suck and are in it for themselves NOT THE CONSUMER. They can cloak themselves in purity all they want but they are blood sucking scumbags. End of my rant <g>

To: Ilaine who wrote (4386)	5/19/2000 1:23:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5853

Cobalt, <rant> I agree that it is likely that MSFT makes it difficult if not impossible for competing software to integrate nicely with Windows [I have no evidence for that other than crashes, but am ever cynical]. While that might be considered a cunning strategy by some in a company adopting such an idea, to me it is stupid and will make people seek somebody who tries to help them, not hinder them. I think it best that each component of a business stand alone from a profitability point of view. Even some in the Q! camp advocated using the lack of royalty payments to subsidize the handset division. I'm pleased that Q! management prefer the idea that if something can't perform or is better run by competitors, it's out! If MSFT really did adopt such a strategy, I think the best remedy [other than claiming fraud and suing if it amounts to that, which I doubt] is to let customers sort out who offers the best overall service. Customers are much more merciless than the legal/judicial industry. Ford would develop a very bad reputation very quickly if they deliberately made cars crash if they used other tyres. But it would be fair enough for them to specify only Ford tyres. A bit like DC10s went out of business because of factors outside their control. Too bad if a rotten pilot made a plane crash; the public just cares about a DC10 going in -- the aircraft manufacturer should specify that ONLY their own pilots are allowed to fly them. I think that's reasonable. But to deliberately make a plane crash if a wrong pilot got control would NOT be the way to get customers. Foolproof is best. That includes computer operating systems and any damn thing at all which might run on them. </Rant> Over and out... Mq

To: Ilaine who wrote (4386)	5/19/2000 1:28:00 AM
From: greedsgd_2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5853

HARM TO CONSUMER - is the litmus test, and this Justice case is probably 90% nonsense, and their new found religion and new case law about MSFT "stifling innovation" is laughable. Strange how MSFT the "abusive monopolist" let the desktop become secondary to the net - thus effectively killing its golden goose. Thought I just heard Larry Ellison say the "net is the computer now". Strange how MSFT with its unlimited "monopoly" power just didn't knock out all these "competitors" - that now seek to destroy MSFT. Linux is still around, now how could that be? This Judge completely ignored hire court rulings, and he will soon be given the same courtesy, when this case goes to appeal.