Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (103623)	5/19/2000 11:00:00 AM
From: Robert Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<Amazing. For a minute I thought I was in the wrong thread. I guess you're not interested in speculating on how soon NASDAQ 3000 will be breached.> What's amazing about it? This thread has always included a healthy dose of "Big Picture" discussion. Even though it seemed to die down at the height of the bubble. Then, 90% of messages contained illuminating content like this: "Bot xyz at 47 5/16 and sold at 48 1/2!!!"

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (103623)	5/19/2000 11:26:00 AM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>For a minute I thought I was in the wrong thread. I guess you're not interested in speculating on how soon NASDAQ 3000 will be breached. Sarmad, at the end of 98...I predicted the Naz will see 2000 by the year 2000. I was wrong. I'm glad! Last year was the year of the IPO, and I rode that mania as long as I could. Btw Have you noticed how many fat pigs are now leaner? I still think Amazon.com is over weight. eBay too. I heard Meg, eBays ceo was down on the traders floor this morning hyping her stock...If I was her I would too.