Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Dorsey Wright & Associates. Point and Figure -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lost1 who wrote (8089)	5/19/2000 10:28:00 AM
From: Tigress	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9427

Clear as a bell: Vertical Count............... I always use the Horizontal Count mode. Must broaden my horizons. Do you favor one over the other in different market environments? Thanks for the explanation. Tig

To: Lost1 who wrote (8089)	5/19/2000 10:57:00 AM
From: Atin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9427

You can use QPnf to get the vertical counts (on completed columns) -- it does the PO automatically. Can you explain what you said in the last paragraph? You like to use the bottom of the recent bottoming action as the number to add to your calculated number that was calculated using a later column? I have two different ways I calculate vertical counts, one is to calculate it on the breakouts, and the other is to calculate it on the reversal from recent bottoming action. QPnf does both. But what you're saying is that you calculate it based on recent bottoming action, but you use the number that you got from the breakout column. Did I read that correctly? Thanks, -Atin pnfcharts.com