SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (80926)5/19/2000 3:44:00 PM
From: bill meehan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB: Looks as if you may never have to spend a few sheckels on a VCR: upside.com



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (80926)5/19/2000 4:32:00 PM
From: novice investor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Hi Michael,

Alan Greenspan seems to be successful in reducing exuberance among NASDAQ hot air balloons but other economic factors show mixed results. Do you happen to have any hunch (perhaps based on A.G.'s previous records) on the degree of "misery" that he would consider as sufficient dosage for current economy? The overall set of economic parameters, including the stock market is beginning to appear more and more like the Japanese '90 economic collapse. If this continues in the same vein, NASDAQ could drop to below 2000 within a year and remain there for a decade.

- Nick



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (80926)5/19/2000 5:06:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 132070
 
To All, This confirms nearly every word that the bears, including Fred Hickey, Earlie, and Bill Fleckenstein have been saying about the Rambus scam from day one: news.cnet.com Odd that it is now referred to even by the body temp IQ media as "the controversial Rambus chip." Gee, there was no controversy when the above sources were raising warning flags. <g>