Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Int'l Wayside Gold Mines Ltd (IWA-VSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (1148)	5/19/2000 1:14:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1321

teevee, I wouldn't go as far as to compare IWA to Ridell. The 1M ounces resource & reserves have been confirmed last year by a company named Geologic Systems Ltd. of New Westminster, B.C. I don't know them but they provided very detailed stuff in January 1999. The problem is that the numbers were uncut and several calculations were suggested at various cut-of grade. IOW, very preliminary numbers. They were supposed to calculate a mineable resource by putting a pit around the block model, as announced in January 1999. This calculation was to be used to produce a mineable reserve required for a feasibility study. Since the company suggested in early April that it was planning to go into production at 3000 tpd, this information is vital and must be released. This is what I haven't seen published and maybe this is what the CDNX wants.

To: teevee who wrote (1148)	5/19/2000 3:58:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1321

I only know you slightly from your posts - you are very quick to try to smear this company? Why? Can't you wait for some facts or do you feel empowered by the things you write?

To: teevee who wrote (1148)	5/20/2000 2:46:00 PM
From: Dan P	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1321

" A microscope review of any remaining reject should be done to confirm, if possible, short of re-drilling the holes, whether or not the gold is naturally occurring or placer gold dust added to the sample." This is supposed to be an example of responsible negative commentary? Suggesting that this is another Bre-x, salting of the cores??? You have got to be kidding. I would be careful, if I were you, to make any suggestions like this and by your buddy Ralph Ulm, or both of you might be needing to speak to members of the legal profession. This is the height of irresponsible posting on this thread. Teevee you have gone over the top. Even hinting that the cores might have been salted is terrible at best, and I have yet to hear whether you are or are not short the stock. Enigma is right. With all of the activity at Wells carefully scrutinized, it would be nearly impossible to even think about salting the cores. In point of fact, two holes are about to be/or are in the process of being twinned.