Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (19209)	5/19/2000 5:29:00 PM
From: haqihana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Neo, If one makes the Chinese "lose face", he had better duck for cover. That is worse than calling them any name that we can come up with. ~;=;o --haqi

To: Neocon who wrote (19209)	5/19/2000 5:48:00 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Whether or not that is true is worth extensive debate, along with the other issues, and the Administration has little credibility to carry on debate. With the leaders of both parties promoting the same policies, there isn't going to be any real debate. Least that's how I see it. As far as the Administrations's credibility to carry on debate - on this issue they don't have to debate. The Republican leadership's position on China trade is IDENTICAL to Clintons. I still don't know why but presume the industries who favor free trade with China simply own both major parties. The only organized opponents are the labor unions (not powerful anymore), Ralph Nader and the far left ( a small powerless segment of the population), and Buchanan and the far right (ditto).