Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (5878)	5/20/2000 6:10:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

While I was ordering the Andean music you recommended I found two more albums that seemed really good - Art of the Andean Flute and The Double Headed Serpent- I ordered them too. And THEN I found a cool album of 16th-18th century Indian music- called Legacy:16th-18th Century Music From India. I listened to over 30 different Indian albums and I must say Legacy presented an interesting selection. Make sure you read the review at Barnes and Noble.com (plus they have a coupon- 10 off a 30 purchase- you can din it at dealofday.com.)

To: Lane3 who wrote (5878)	5/20/2000 7:46:00 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

I've always thought that the real function of the safety net was pragmatic. If you give people the opportunity to succeed or fail, some will always fail, even if the deck is evenly stacked, which it isn't. If we let the failures starve, they make a mess. The safety ne programs are based on the assumption that at a certain level it is cheaper to subsidize the basic needs of the failures than it is to clean up the mess they would make if they weren't subsidized. There is of course the issue of possible parasitism, and of reducing the incentive to succeed, which is addressed by making the benefits small and by making the process of getting them so thoroughly humiliating that no functional person would want to rely on them. I would agree that the system needs review and change, as do all systems: the same could be said of military procurement. But I think the idea is basically not an unreasonable one.