Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (72033)	5/21/2000 1:02:00 AM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

David Tice said nothing about QCOM. Our source was a douchebag. Jon. eom.

To: marginmike who wrote (72033)	5/21/2000 1:16:00 AM
From: Didi	Respond to of 152472

Mike-re: I didn't hear the actual interview. Someone posted Tice, later corrected to Alger as the fund manager who recommended Q. Regards, di

To: marginmike who wrote (72033)	5/21/2000 2:24:00 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 152472

No, it was not David Tice, but David Alger...I misheard the attribute on Keeping Stock segment on CNBC with Ted David filling in Friday for Bill who was still in Chi-town on his 'road trip'. I reported the reco correctly and also got correct the two reasons why ALGER said it was a buy here at 89ish, but got the speaker's name wrong. I apologized to the thread once for my name attribution miss-posting. Sorry my confusion got you upsot as well. I guess I was a little excited, because I had just doubled my Q long position thru my online broker just moments before ALGER uttered his reco. Kind of startled me. I don't follow mutual funds at all. Again, my apologies. It was David Alger who said HE'd be a buyer of Q at this price, during a live TAKING STOCK CNBC segment, Friday 5/19/2000. <eom>