SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bilow who wrote (42688)5/21/2000 9:47:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Carl,

Did you finally get paid? Are you back on the job again?

You know they are not using graphics DDR in the PC motherboard. In fact, most of these companies have only engineering samples. You keep equating the Nvidia DDR with the PC DDR. They are not the same. But maybe mom and pop will believe you. <G>

I think there is a substantial chance of product transition problems using DDR at 266 MHZ. As you yourself pointed out the Nvidia graphics DDR only runs at 166 MHZ and that is soldered directly into the board.

Look for significant product transition problems with DDR.
INTEL needs only about 2.4 M RDRAMS components for Willamette shipments this year. I am sure Samsung, Toshiba or NEC would be happy to take their purchase order.
DELL alone could sell and ship all those Willamette systems.
No problem.

Perhaps DDR is just one of your xxx dreams.<LOL>

:)



To: Bilow who wrote (42688)5/22/2000 6:29:00 AM
From: John Walliker  Respond to of 93625
 
Carl,

Both designs had problems with their Rambus interface, intersymbol interference etc

Evidence please

John