Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Burry who wrote (10636)	5/22/2000 6:52:00 PM
From: James Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78953

Ambac I invested with no thought of selling for two years 1996-1998 and the stock doubled. Since then I've been trading it. I buy below 50, double down below 45, then sell above 55 and exit above 60. That has worked several round trips. I am changing that strategy now - I've got my position now average cost below 50 and will sell half between 55 and 60 and hold the rest for a run to 80. This one is long overdue to break to new highs given the way earnings have been growing. There's always the chance of a takeover at 75 to make the decisions much easier.

To: Michael Burry who wrote (10636)	5/25/2000 6:48:00 AM
From: Wallace Rivers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78953

Mike, perused through VSN this AM, saw you are looking at WDFC. In a bit of a related question, might you be looking at NPK, which has gotten hammered lately because of issues with Wal-Mart (as memory serves). I have no position in either stock. Thanks for the heads up on SYMC - boy, it sure is volatile, but clearly one of the most undervalued tech stocks out there.