To: Bill Harmond who wrote (450 ) 5/22/2000 3:32:00 PM From: Eric Wells Respond to of 57684
You're full of suggestions, Eric. Yes, I have made some suggestions lately.Suggestions about rules, This is true - I've made several suggestions on how the thread rules and policies could be improved.suggestions about content, Yes, I have suggested to you that you could enhance your credibility if you had a greater focus on risk.Gene thinks you're trying to pick a fight. He could be right, because, for example, I don't see any complaints by you about objectivity on the Amazon thread. It's unfortunate that Gene interpreted my questioning regarding the risk of purchasing QCOM leaps as my attempt to pick a fight. Regarding things I've posted on the AMZN thread - I haven't been posting much lately. When you posted there, I believe there were many times when you and I disagreed on things.I don't owe you anything. You don't - and I have never claimed you do.I'm not a newsletter writer. I never have deposited any checks from you. You're absolutely right on both counts - and I've never made such claims.I just say what I'm doing and debate issues I'm interested in. Take them for what they're worth, contribute here if you want, but quit complaining. I've tried to engage you in debate - but you're reaction has been a bit hostile. I did indeed complain to you about the thread junta's decision to abruptly silence Kis - as I stated in several messages last week, I thought the action was unfair and represented a gross abuse of power. You may interpret my posts today as "complaint' - but the intent of my posts was to try to focus part of the discussion here on risks - I think such a focus would be healthy in this market. If you find my making suggestions is disrupting the thread - then, please take the vote. Thanks, -Eric