Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommaso who wrote (72166)	5/22/2000 9:27:00 PM
From: The Verve	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Tommaso, I think what Diamond is saying is you've got a bit of knowledge you still have to attain before you begin posting and making comments. Many of the posters here spend an exorbinant amount of time studying, researching, learning, watching, and reflecting on where this company currently stands and where it's heading in the future. We'd love for you to join in, but you've got to walk before you run, and you're not even crawling yet. Here is somewhere you at least can start, goto ultimate.org Catch up, then join in. We'd love to talk with you... Verve

To: Tommaso who wrote (72166)	5/23/2000 4:16:00 AM
From: shamsaee	Respond to of 152472

With all due respect,Some the guys who post hear have held this company for years when the stock price was not going anywhere and all the other techs where flying.They know the ins and out of the company and you will never end up buying if you are waiting for these guys to give up including myself.I recommend reading a couple of thousand of the posts on the Qcom S&P thread to understand what the company does and where its going.Even the guys who are not in the stock Right now are planning on loading the boat the minute the stock hits their target price.78 today was a steal in my humble opinion. You might call it a blessing or your good fortune that you did not post on the other thread today as the response would have been a lot more vigorous<gg>. Best regards, Sham