To: MikeM54321 who wrote (7066 ) 5/24/2000 1:20:00 AM From: wonk Respond to of 12823
Mike:The T executive claimed that TDMA sports some 300 million users worldwide. I suppose if you say GSM is really a form of TDMA, then it's accurate. BUT as we all know, they are not compatible technologies for a customer and IMO, should not be lumped together. Sure they should be lumped together. The pooled R&D for the next generation TDMA systems looks towards convergence. Furthermore, efficiency enhancements which work on one flavor generally work on the other.T's executive is claiming that when T rolls out broadband mobile wireless--TDMA-EDGE technology next year, it will be fully GSM-EDGE compatible. Not only that, he claims it will do a robust 356 Kbps data rate! And either he was alluding to, or claiming(I don't recall which), that T's broadband wireless network will be European compatible and ready to go next year!? Reading any company's pronouncements (CDMA TDMA, any alphabet soup technology), one has to sift their words. Almost invariably rollouts slide. Data speeds pronouncements - absent definitive statements of presumptive system operating conditions - are useless. To answer you question however, the UWCC, is definitively proclaiming that EDGE deployments will occur in 2001-2.uwcc.org More on EDGE and all the next generation standards...csdmag.com The whole religious war between CDMA and TDMA was based upon adolescent debate techniques, i.e., I'm going to analyze my system under the most favorable conditions, I'll analyze yours under the worst. Has CDMA firmly entrenched itself as a legitimate mobile wireless technology - absolutely. Is GSM or digital-AMPS going to die? No way. I've learned a lot reading your posts on the MSO perspective and what drive's them. Distilling it down, the motivations of the industry players seem to be no different then in the wireless industry. Manufacturers and investors fight technological religious wars - generally not carriers or operators. The carriers will pay lip service to the war, primarily in an investor relations function. While from the outside looking in, technology choices and rollout schedules may seem irrational, almost invariably one can puzzle out the basis by looking at cost and near-term competitive strategy. The company balance sheet has a lot to do with it as well <g>. ww