Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (1880)	5/23/2000 5:00:00 PM
From: Gut Trader	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

Well weren't the fires @ Los alamos started by the fed as a preventative measure. GT@Nero.needsa.newfiddle.com

To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (1880)	5/23/2000 5:20:00 PM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13572

2900 has been thrown about for sometime now, we should get rally off that, but the vol. has been so anemic. Have the players already booked profit and gone off to the Hamptoms already? <g> I got this feeling that 2900 will not hold due to the lack of vol. and complacency that still apparent. So 2600 Aug. low of last year might be it after a breach of 2900, fear might come back into play and vol. will pick up, and at 2600 valuation players would be beside themselves. Greg