SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cheryl williamson who wrote (45147)5/23/2000 7:35:00 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
I'll ignor all the Netcraft stats because they are not
relevant. I'll say it again. SUNW isn't worried about
M$FT, and doesn't need to be worried.


Boy, I am glad that's true. Now, I wont have to read your defensive/offensive posts every 15 seconds on the MSFT thread. You probably thought this was the IBM thread.



To: cheryl williamson who wrote (45147)5/23/2000 8:06:00 PM
From: SC  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 74651
 
Cheryl, every time you go to the grocery, wal-mart,etc. and write a check they require you to put your drivers license number on the check. Many people actually have it printed on their checks along with their name and address. It's no secret that in many states, your social security number is used as your drivers license number. Something like 65000 people have had their identities stolen using the information from their checks. I have yet to see someone say "No I won't give you that information, I'd rather pay cash." Invariably they give the information requested. So you see, vast numbers (probably the majority) of people are blissfully ignorant of security risks, or simply don't care unless they have been severely affected (e.g. identity stolen, bill collectors calling to collect for merchandise and services being enjoyed by someone else).

How is giving someone your credit card number over the phone or on a paper catalog order secured? What guarantee do you have that the Sun Solaris powered vendor you deal with isn't sharing your credit information with other interested parties for a little extra effortless profit?

Do you shred your credit card reciepts, or simply throw them in the trash?

Do you disable the cookies on your browser, or do you simply decline to visit sites that require them (it's almost impossible to order anything over the web unless you let them set a cookie)?

Do you pay cash for big ticket items to avoid allowing your vendor to peek into your credit history?

Most people are consciously or unconsciously accepting the tradeoff of convenience in lieu of privacy/security. The genie is out of the bottle, and unless you do business on a strictly cash basis, the amount of information people can get about your finances is almost limitless, even if you never do business on-line. And if you pay cash for items over a given threshold (I think its $10000 but I'm not sure) the vendor is required to inform the feds who will then investigate you, which generates some sort of record which can presumably be found and possibly be exploited by someone trying to take advantage of you (the assumption is the only people who make large purchases with cash are tax-cheats, drug dealers, money launderers or all of the above).

Steve



To: cheryl williamson who wrote (45147)5/26/2000 4:34:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
cheryl - re: The file system is no more secure than CPM
was.


Are you confusing Win2K and Win9X? NTFS security is stronger and more flexible than security at the file level on Unix... and is much more closely related to the VMS file system (like much of NT) than to any MSFT file system designs for the PC. It was based on a big system file architecture which was mature before Unix got out of the university setting.