Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Corel Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crystal ball who wrote (9153)	5/24/2000 10:35:00 AM
From: Daniel Chisholm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9798

Uh, $10 each SUM OF THE PARTS: Wordperfect + JAVA + LINUX + Quattro Pro + Paradox + Office Suite, this doesn't sound right to me. $10 times 66 million shares is $660 million. That is a lot of money to pay for each of these components. Recall that Corel paid four hundred and something million dollars to Novell for WordPerfect and whatever else they bought from them -- a price which later proved to have been much, much too high. "JAVA" -- well, they sold that to Graphon (their jBridge stuff). And for quite a bit less than $660M -- anyhow, it's already gone. "LINUX" -- that isn't theirs to sell. They don't own it. What reason is there to think that Corel can do a better job with Linux than can the other top companies (Red Hat, for instance) who have been in that business much longer, have top notch products, and a proven track record? "Office Suite" -- that would be double counting the "WordPerfect" and "QuattroPro" parts, wouldn't it? The fact of the matter is, they had sales of $44M in their most recent quarter (vs. $40M in the year-ago quarter). Their sales "increased by $6.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2000, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 1999 primarily due to the success of CorelDRAW 9, released May 1999, as compared to CorelDRAW 8 being near the end of its lifecycle in Q1 1999." (source: 1Q00 10-Q, Management Discussion and analysis), so one could argue (I would) that their 1Q00 revenues are cyclically overstated. The idea that they'll have tens of millions of Linux sales Real Soon Now is ridiculous. They have no growth. They have no earnings. To speak of a P/E or a PEG therefore makes no sense. Their stock price might be "low", but it certainly isn't "cheap". They are overvalued, cash-starved, and quite likely to be unable to "pull a rabbit out of a hat" this time, in spite of the fact that that phrase ("pull a rabbit") systematically appears in many of the "analyst opinion" news releases/interviews. Corel might be bought out, but their share price (even at $US3.5) still isn't "cheap". Or, they might go bankrupt, and the shares will (eventually) be essentially worthless. I'd say that an attractive price (for a buyer who intended to make a business out of it) would be $50 to $100 million (US), if a buyer was able to get it soon, and have Cowpland out as part of the fresh start. That's about $1.50 (US) tops, IMHO, if there is a buyer who is interested in paying for a cash cow with a dying stable of products that nevertheless likely have a few years life left in them. But there don't seem to be many cash-flush aggressive buyers these days..... Anyone trying to make money by buying Corel shares now ought to consider the possibility that they are risking substantial losses, and that any profit they might make will be contingent upon them outsmarting the market (not impossible, but perhaps not the easiest bet in the world either). - Daniel

To: Crystal ball who wrote (9153)	5/25/2000 3:12:00 AM
From: Kashish King	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9798

Crystal, Wordperfect is filler for free-stuff CDs that ship with a bargain-basement computers and motherboards. Corel botched up their Java effort and canned it, so you aren't making any sense there. There are dozens of Linux vendors and several more on the way. It's a free operating system and Corel is simply riding the bandwagon. Microsoft could have Linux in a couple of weeks if they so desired. Now, Quattro Pro is that badly named spreadsheet from the middle 80's developed by Borland. Paradox is also an ex-Borland product: a badly named and incredibly hoaky database. As for Dragon speech recognition, that's not Corel's product. Sure sounds like a lot of washed-up products to me. Well, OK, they haven't washed up yet: their products are dead in the water and bobbing close to shore. Corel is simply a very, very bad gamble. You would be better off with expired lottery tickets.