Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (31886)	5/23/2000 11:29:00 PM
From: WE89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42771

Where is you buddy Kilo. Look at the chart it speaks for itself as I have stated before. P.S. where are the law suits hmmm. NOVL still a short.

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (31886)	5/24/2000 7:15:00 AM
From: mar8tin	Respond to of 42771

on may 21,00 i wrote....the classic case of hiring DR> E>S> turning a top computer genius into a top executive....you lose a TOP COMPUTER GENIUS and you get a LOUSY MANAGER in return..... that is what is wrong at NOVL at the present time....mglotz@aol.com today i am off to attend the annual shareholders meeting of A.T T. in Chicago i attended the 1961 share meeting attendance 20,000 attendees. i expect to speak at meeting mglotz@aol.com

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (31886)	5/24/2000 8:05:00 AM
From: Paul Fiondella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42771

Your posts are your ego trip and your blasting me for "ignoring you" shows it. When you have something to say that is relevant to owning NOVL, I will be happy to comment.

To: Frederick Smart who wrote (31886)	5/25/2000 2:22:00 PM
From: Scott C. Lemon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42771

Hello Frederick, Wow ... you guys post a lot! I'm reading as fast as I can! In this post to Paul you stated: > Fiondella..... > > Head in the sand - ignoring my posts - seems like you're > a confirmed apoligist of the current dysfunction. Hmmm ... this is sounding pretty negative from a usually positive guy. You aren't trying to make Paul wrong here are you? > There's a big difference in supporting the person, but > NOT the dysfunction. I'm not being personal against you > or Novell. I would suggest that you don't think you are ... but "actions speak louder than words" ... I've realized this myself recently ... > You don't "get down" on people for this does nothing but > encourage position building instead of collaboration and > cooperation. And so what is this post, that you wrote, doing? I'm not saying that it is right or wrong, but it sure seems to be a post which is "get[ting] down" on Paul ... I'm simply trying to offer some observations ... Scott C. Lemon