To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1718 ) 5/24/2000 1:32:00 PM From: John Pitera Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
My thought on crude topping is that the Global market declines Especially in the US and Japan will start to push down prices. since crude is so volatile this bear calendar spread might be a lower risk position to put on. CRUDE OIL Kyle Cooper, Houston Testing the range May 19, 2000 After finding a bottom in April, NYMEX crude has moved up sharply, recently breaking above the $30 level. The July crude futures has moved up over $7 per barrel since the low of April 26. Buying has been consistent in the latest advance, with "up" days outnumbering "down" days by more than three-to-one. The NYMEX strength has also brought the OPEC "basket" of crude prices above the $28 level. This is the first time that the OPEC "basket" has traded above OPEC's desired $22-28 range. Uncertainty still remains as to the exact details of implementation under OPEC's plan to increase production. The organization's stated strategy is to increase or decrease production by 500,000 barrels per day (b/d) if the "basket" price is above or below, respectively, the band for 20 days. However, the mechanisms for this are unclear. Does OPEC raise production only if prices are above the band for 20 consecutive days? As an example, if the "basket" trades at $28.01 for 19 days and then drops to $27.99 for a day, would this meet the strategy's criteria or would the day-count reset? This could certainly provide the base for a substantial price advance. Does OPEC target the 20-day moving average? This approach presents a rather different problem. If the "basket" trades at $27.99 for 19 days, then jumps to $28.50 for one day, the moving average would move above $28. It is unlikely OPEC price hawks would begin pumping extra oil with only one day outside the range. However, in this case an increase in production would be required if the moving average is the determinant. Additionally, who actually gives the authorization to increase output and by how much? It must also be considered that some members might increase production early in anticipation of a triggered increase. Obviously, many questions still remain to be resolved. From what has been stated so far, OPEC members are quite satisfied with the current price and have no major inclination to immediately raise production. This contentment with the current market situation has been widely expressed by many OPEC members. Despite a recent report by the International Energy Agency (IEA) estimating that worldwide third quarter demand will exceed production by 220,000 b/d and by more than 1.7 million b/d in the fourth quarter, OPEC members have adamantly resisted calls to increase production after their next meeting (June 21). This has provided a great deal of support to the market. Members consistently refer to the agreement to raise production if the prices are outside the agreement's band. We expect relatively high market volatility. With prices at the upper end of the OPEC price band and an election year underway in the U.S., we expect to hear a great deal of political rhetoric from the U.S. Already, Energy Secretary Richardson has been vocal about $30 crude being too high. He has pleaded with OPEC members to "keep an open mind" regarding possible production increase after the June 21 meeting. Although denying any production increases will be discussed, David Goldwyn, U.S. Assistant Energy Secretary for International Affairs, recently departed on a trip to the Gulf region. The stated goal was to encourage "general energy cooperation" between the United States and the Gulf nations. Goldwyn is taking part in a Commerce Department trade mission to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait-OPEC members, all. He will also take a separate trip to Oman, not a member of the oil cartel. "In all countries, he'll discuss a broad range of energy issues," a Commerce Department spokesman said. "However, his primary purpose is to advocate U.S. business and strengthen bilateral energy ties." However, Richardson was quite active and vocal before the last OPEC meeting. It should be considered at least possible that production increases are being discussed. We expect prices to continue higher with wide price swings until more details of production increase are determined. Volatility should remain high as the market is swayed by the latest news releases. This condition presents a very difficult trading environment. There are certain strategies that offer a lower-risk entry into the crude market. With the market already near what could be a top, a bear calendar spread should be considered. The most recent move has increased the backwardation in the market. The July crude oil futures recently traded at over a $2.80 premium to the December contract. We consider this to be extreme. The average July premium since last November is just over a $1.00. Our view is that any further advances in the near-month contracts will pull the back-month contracts higher as well. With forecasts for a fourth quarter supply deficit, we do not think any correction will affect the fourth quarter contracts as severely. Other short-term factors could, of course, cause the front-month contracts to continue higher and increase the backwardation, but we consider this unlikely. While unwilling to sell this market outright, we do look for a near-term correction. Trading RecommendationLook to sell July/buy December crude oil at a July premium of $3.25 per barrel, risking $.50. geocities.com the spread is at 2.72 at the momentnymex.com the nymex website does not want to let me link the quotes page.... darn -g- The spread is 2.72 with July at 29.53 and Dec 2000 @ 26.81