SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (72356)5/24/2000 6:04:00 PM
From: allen menglin chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
sold QCOM @ 83 1/2 AH from 70 3/8 on CNBC hype. Will get them cheaper tomorrow.

QCOM becomes a China momo play like CHINA/XING/CPIH/SINA. That's too funny. I'm shorting all those momo now.



To: Boplicity who wrote (72356)5/24/2000 6:26:00 PM
From: waverider  Respond to of 152472
 
Oops...ok, how about "bear sounding?" <g>

BTW, good luck with your MS fund raiser. It is wonderful that you do that.

Rick



To: Boplicity who wrote (72356)5/24/2000 7:07:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
"hey I still own shares long, watch who you call a bear."

Listen Greg. You seem like a very nice guy so let me be kind. You have been a HUGE BEAR for the past 3 months and recently seem to have been on a mission to scare the hell out of the folks who are long. You have top be kidding that you are long when you are calling for a fall to the 50's and coming damn close to calling qcom dead money for years.

And the truth is you have been accurate on your calls for a drop, but you keep lowering the price target.

If you think I am wrong about the impression you have left, go back and read your posts with an open mind. And as I said, I suspect you are a nice guy who is just unaware of how bearish you have come across.

Posting this was a nice touch: investech.com

And this:
"I hold about that same amount I'm questioning the sanity of doing so, PE are still too high for the following, CSCO 142, ORCL 115, QCOM 115 and SUNW 84."

Nothing personal.



To: Boplicity who wrote (72356)5/24/2000 7:22:00 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Gregory. It depresses me to read your posts which are two standard deviations to the negative side of normal. Unfortunately, you have been right more than wrong lately. I like to say that you are right for all the wrong reasons.
JohnG