Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Agenda who wrote (22572)	5/25/2000 10:21:00 AM
From: gpowell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

If all you want to do is have someone make you money, you should give that $50,000 to KW. I understand he has done quite well. I'm serious.

To: Agenda who wrote (22572)	5/26/2000 3:01:00 AM
From: KW Wingman	Respond to of 29970

It wasn't difficult. What should be unbelievable but is not, is that all of Ah's points were in just in one of his posting #22321. It is not unbelievable because most of us are used to it. You could pick about any of Ah's posts and find plenty of his points to add to the list. Some of his gems that I listed as a single point were actually several points as in; <... FED officials like government officials can't trust people. They know people are inferior and need to be handled like cattle. The result of this attitude is the people act like cattle. > 1. <FED officials like government officials can't trust people.> 2 <They know people are inferior> 3. (people) <need to be handled like cattle.> 4. <The result of this attitude is the people act like cattle.> Any of these sub points could be debated separately. This is why it is very difficult to debate with Ah. He overwhelms his readers with so many of these Controversial points. IMO, an open minded person should not take these points at face value. Ah also intoxicates many of his readers with his powerful vocabulary. Many people do not challenge him because of this. Speaking of vocabulary, I had to look up "sophist" in the dictionary today. Lo and behold, I saw Ah's face for the first time. <g> To help others who share my limited vocabulary, I have posted the definition. Sorry, according to SI rules I could not copy Ah's photo for you. (of course, you have already seen him). sophúist (sfst) n. One skilled in elaborate and devious argumentation. A scholar or thinker. Sophist A Greek philosopher of pre-Socratic times who inquired about and speculated on theology, metaphysics, mathematics, and the natural and biological sciences. A professional philosopher and teacher, especially one belonging to a group of fifth-century B.C. Greek philosophers who specialized in dialectic, argumentation, and rhetoric and who were often known for their elaborate and specious arguments. <<<<Good thing I didn't pay that 50 thousand for it. Do you think some here did?>>>> If they did they're are not talking about it. OTOH, where there is smoke ...