SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Quickdraw who wrote (13141)5/25/2000 4:17:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14627
 
<<Shrake and gang have reduced the risk in Luicho enough in my mind to justify the current share price in PFG.>>

I agree with that. But expectations are for a 7-10M ounces discovery. And I think you will agree that they might not meet these. The risks I see is for them to find only 3-4M ounces of gold. Depending on the economics, it could mean a stock way below current market value.

<<The next few months should be interesting for all three.>>

I certainly hope so. As long as gold doesn't move below $200... <g>



To: Quickdraw who wrote (13141)5/25/2000 5:42:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Respond to of 14627
 
Qd,

A good article on gold hedging. It is interesting to notice that Francisco'El Sauzal project is listed among those with the best economics.

tocqueville.com

Until PFG's Luchio makes that list, I continue to believe that FGX is much less risky than PacRim. Still, I want to own both.