Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Berry Picker who wrote (3243)	5/25/2000 7:06:00 PM
From: Bill Mooney	Respond to of 4269

Could Canada Newswire be held responsible.How the heck can they change the units or anything from the original.WHY don't we just put lbs /ton and an make a killing selling it short on the spike an then say sorry afterwards. I hope this is being reported to the appropriate people.Rewriting a news release should be totally illegal.

To: Berry Picker who wrote (3243)	5/25/2000 7:51:00 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4269

Grains or grams those results look uneconomical by any standard I know. For the record, I own equal amounts of the five main Sundbury players (including FGR.and glb) and I don't trade them, so I don't pump and I don't bash. If I am wrong I am ready to be corrected. The PGM's look real strong, but the mkt sure is not buying Sudbury (or any other PGM play for that matter)as a PGM proxy so far. PFN still has the best results and the mkt doesn't seem to care much for them either. I am hoping the PGM's will continue to rise and Sudbury will continue to prove up ore, and eventually the mkt will get interested in Sudbury, but I still consider my investment a gamble.