Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (35885)	5/25/2000 10:19:00 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

<once the popular press picks up on a trend, it is usually close to being over...but maybe this time it's different..> I don't think that matters now... we're in a trend, and if anything public pulling back is REAL BAD IMO... you start getting people switching money flows and forget it, this thing has to be 'held up'. DAK

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (35885)	5/25/2000 11:38:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

generally, I agree, but I think there's also a threshold somewhere and that we may be close; we should be at NAZ 3800 by now if there were going to be a reversal -- at least NAZ 3650 or so ... (MM will love that -- tempting fate or some such other <vbg>) I think it is different this time ... (didn't a famous bull say that? <eg>)

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (35885)	5/26/2000 12:04:00 PM
From: John Graybill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

Not to worry, he coughs up a furball about halfway down. Let's playyyy...Spot The Contradiction!: Indeed, some on Wall Street actually would welcome a panic-driven "blowoff," led by tech stocks, saying it could mark the end of the current bear market for tech shares and perhaps lead to a less spectacular but more sustainable upward move.