Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (80060)	5/26/2000 3:20:00 PM
From: haqihana	Respond to of 108807

Rambi, Comments made to you about X, were only done when I had said I would not post to her and would not go back on my word. That situation has changed and will not occur again. My Christian Faith has to do with what happens with an already existing soul, IMO. I have covered some of my thinking on this with Lather so, if you haven't read my post to him this morning, please do so. I don't think I said that anything was "generally accepted" but it seemed, to me, that the dictionary referred to it that way. Perhaps we should all just throw our dictionaries away since they are so deficient, eh??? It is true that I have no "proof" that a soul exists either, in or out of theology but, you do not have any proof that it does not. So another stalemate asserts itself. Just because you do not believe a soul does not exist, does not make it so, and just because I do, does not make it so. Anyone that cannot see the stalemate here, would then be biased in favor of THEIR opinion being able to OVERRIDE the truth by PROOF. I don't think anyone would want to appear to be that far off base. ~H~