Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harvey Allen who wrote (45425)	5/26/2000 1:33:00 AM
From: Thunder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

If you buy the "Win on Appeal" argument good luck. Let me know if I have got this straight; the DC Appeals Court flips a coin or draws straws to reach a conclusion? Are you also insinuating since it takes sheer luck, that Microsoft take their rabbits feet with them to the courtroom? Furthermore, was it bad luck for Microsoft in the lower court, or is it that the luck factor only applies selectively to a particular court, or circumstance? Help me out Harvey, I know this is "the new age" but geez, this is America. Regards, Gary

To: Harvey Allen who wrote (45425)	5/26/2000 10:42:00 AM
From: sandeep	Respond to of 74651

Harvey, fortunately, when a person is driving drunk, there are reliable non-(interpretation dependent) tests which prove or disprove person's drunkenness. There are none in this case. Markets can be defined in many different ways, similarly monopolies, consumer harm. They are all dependent on what ifs. So, your analogy is completely wrong. The judge is supposed to be a rational, calm man who listens to both sides very carefully. A dozing, irritable and incredibly aggressive judge is bad for the third branch. Also, as if you didn't know, Bill and Steve have most of their money in Microsoft. So, you are misinformed there too. How many mistakes can you make in one post ???