Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thor Carlsen who wrote (13142)	5/26/2000 3:57:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Respond to of 14226

My God, Thor, just think of how many ONIONS! they can peel in 284 days! Brings tears to my eyes!

To: Thor Carlsen who wrote (13142)	5/28/2000 9:51:00 AM
From: Thor Carlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

From 1996 GUS R. to the present Nielson GPGI Compliance Department . <<Inadvertent Denial of Water Permit by ADEQ This post is written to assure investors that the reported denial of GPGI's Aquifer Protection Permit is not true, but the unfortunate result of a computer glitch at the offices of the ADEQ. We are on schedule with their office and all comments and questions have been responded to. The administrative review is almost complete and then a technical review of the application will be undertaken. We have no reason to believe at the present time that the Permit will not be granted to GPGI. The permitting process has been long and burdensome however and I would hope they will grant the permit within the next 30-45 days, but we have no control over how long they will take in this matter. Robert J. Nielson Compliance Department Global Platinum + Gold, Inc.>>> The pasted text above and below comes from our brethren stock board. The "she" is Lisa from the State of Arizona. The "Nielson" is from the GPGI Compliance Department . The source for both are from the Internet. --------> Right now she has all the information she requested from the company and the ball is in her court. She can do one of three things - ask for more info; reject the application; or three send it to technical review She will decide one of the three in the next four days and make an announcement. If it is rejected the company can reapply later if it wishes. If it goes to technical review then according to AZ legislation they have 280 days to decide whether to approve the application or not. At any point during the process they can ask the company for more info and the 280 day clock starts back at zero again. Based on this I don't have any idea where the 30-45 day timeframe comes from in Neilsen's post. It would seem that the most optimistic outcome is 284 days. I got the impression that beside the technical aspects of the proposal they also look at the capability of the people employed at the site to know what they are doing. <-----------