SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sarkie who wrote (35957)5/26/2000 10:03:00 AM
From: The Phoenix  Respond to of 63513
 
NAZ Close Predictions 5/26/2000

1500 Cheeky (Not watching markets anymore till September) Kid
3077 AG
3100 Wxdude (probably golfing tomorrow as well)
3120 OG (Next week I'll be a bull again - sold everything this morning)
3165 Rich1 Low volume very volatile day
3202 MrU 3202.02 I get a NAZ close GRUB <g>
3216 Smithee
3223 Sarkie A drome ending
3237 mph 3236.9 - (fighting for truth and justice tomorrow)
3247 Carolyn (because it just came to me)
3259 OMD (Golfing tomorrow so won't be watching either)
3295 arno
3311 SmthSail(Playing golf tomorrow too)
3434 JXM



To: Sarkie who wrote (35957)5/26/2000 10:31:00 AM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
Cheeky's number brought down the average consensus

I am not a statistician, but I think a statistically valid consensus number would require that all non-serious predictions that are wildly off from the mean should be thrown out in calculating the consensus. Maybe the rule of thumb is anybody "predicting" a move of more than ten percent on the Naz in one day is not included in the consensus.

Just a suggestion for the master organizer.

MD



To: Sarkie who wrote (35957)5/26/2000 10:36:00 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 63513
 
Can we do thread average calculations with and without cheeky's pick?