SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jenna who wrote (99770)5/26/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: Ron Pratt  Respond to of 120523
 
I'm going to wonder why the investing community will accept valuations of stocks when the Nasdaq is comfortably trading between 3500-4000 when they couldn't on the way down. After all, I believe we'll be in that range in the not to distant future, {although I definately think we go lower, first) with not alot of change in stock fundamentals. Will it be because we were told 'it just had to be'?



To: Jenna who wrote (99770)5/26/2000 11:00:00 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
Jenna,got to love your logic...discipline on the downside is much more important than on the upside...keep up the good work.



To: Jenna who wrote (99770)5/27/2000 2:43:00 AM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 120523
 
How true it is.......How to Play the
Nightmare, Part 5: It's Time
to Capitulate
By James J. Cramer

5/26/00 12:25 PM ET

A nightmare! In a multipart series
this week, Jim Cramer is taking a
look at the stock selloff and what
individual investors can do to
protect themselves in a market
that's scaring even the most
seasoned veteran. Don't miss
Part 4.

By the beginning of this year, like 1989 in Japan, you
had to be a moron NOT to be in stocks. You had to be a
moron not to be leveraged. I didn't see the nightmare
coming until March. I didn't see it coming until my friend
Steve Galbraith walked me personally through the
margin numbers. From his perch at S.C. Bernstein,
where there are no underwritings, no bullish vested
interests, Galbraith opened my eyes with is
no-nonsense work about how out of control the
borrowing had become. He began to pen a series of
emails to me saying that maybe I could play a role in
avoiding the train wreck that was coming.

Jeff Berkowitz saw it too. He would be the man on the
phone to the partners playing the role I did with Marty
Peretz in 1984. Things had gotten too heady. We were
taking money off the table. Nah, we weren't going to
abandon it. We just weren't going to play with a lot of
capital.

At the top, and indeed March 10 was the top, margin
debt was highest. Stocks were doubling in two or three
days. My email became a cesspool of hundreds of
readers per day telling me how much better they were
than I was. We dipped and then came back, and I went
on TV and said, "Take something off the table." I penned
piece after piece saying to take it off the table.

The heat was unimaginable.
Everybody who had heard
my worries in October 1998
wrote me to tell me that I
was Chicken Little. I was
bombarded by people who told me I didn't know what I
was talking about, that I was getting out when things
were just getting good. I remember showing the hate
mail for my bearishness to my wife. She could say only
one thing: "What a bunch of suckers. When you, a bull
for 18 years, gets negative, it means something."

I had seen the movie. I saw it in 1984. I saw it in 1994.
The Fed had been too easy. The Fed had screwed up.
We all have to pay whenever the Fed is too easy. The
Fed had let the party go on too long. Now we all had to
be punished. Now we all had to bear the pain of their
lack of caution and our shunning of any caution.

Now it is clear to all but those who are too stupid or too
thick or too vested or too blind that that we are in one of
those periods where money cannot be made. Oh sure,
there will be someone who claims to have a formula.
Someone who can short it just right.

But deep down we know the truth. People have to lose
money here. They have to learn that mutual funds aren't
safe and stocks aren't safe. They have to realize that
cash is safe. And if we don't realize it, the Fed will make
cash more profitable the longer we ignore the warnings.
In the end, we will finally have an alternative to stocks:
cash. Cash will be what we brag about. Cash will be the
asset class we will speak of the way we spoke of
stocks and new issues. We will love cash the way we
loved Brocade (BRCD:Nasdaq - news - boards) and
Commerce One (CMRC:Nasdaq - news - boards) and
Scient (SCNT:Nasdaq - news - boards) and Viant
(VIAN: - news - boards). We will love cash the way we
loved Janus and Aim and Alliance and Fidelity.

Of course, the moment will come when we can like
stocks again. But it is a moment in time, not in
fundamentals. Enough money has to be lost to remind
us of the risks of owning equities. Who knows when that
is? When consumer spending drops because people
have to sell stocks to buy anything? When rates get so
attractive that stocks get so cheap that takeovers
begin? When enough companies go bankrupt that
supply gets removed, forcibly removed?

But to declare that the moment is here
now is just wrong. We just got out of
the denial phase. In fact, this was the
first week that I saw capitulation, an
understanding that sales were going to
have to be made to preserve capital.
This week past was Week 1 of fear. It would be too glib
to think that one week of capitulation defines the period.
Not after these years of fat.

Deep down we know what the bottom looks like. The
bottom comes when you stop looking at the business
pages entirely. The bottom comes when you stop
reading about the market. The bottom comes when you
curse the icons on TV who came to represent the bull
market. The bottom comes when all of the pain is taken
and the Fed is done tightening and the margin debt
declines for several more months.

It has to happen this way. The alternative is Japan,
where it went on for five years instead of five months.
Where trillions of dollars of capital were destroyed by a
prolonged market crash. We can't have that happen. We
can't. And the Fed won't let it happen. Too much at
stake. The greatness of the nation, just like the
greatness of what was the greatest economy of the
latter half of the 20th century, the empire of Japan. That
blueprint must not be followed.

Stop asking when will it end. That will make you no
money. Just remember, like in '84 and in '94, it does
end. And wait. I want you to be in there with me when it
ends. I want you to make money with me. Don't knock
yourself out of the game. Play small. Stay in touch.
Stay in current. Believe me, it will get good again. But
only if you have enough money to play.

We are in a cathartic period right now. No new deals. No
new issuance. A decline in margin debt. A recognition
that it is hard again. That's how it was before the Net
revolution. That's how it was before money became too
easy.

That's how it will be again. Returns won't be as great as
they were. That's OK. They can't remain that strong
without the value of the money created being debased
by inflation. That's why we should not scorn the Fed for
playing the role of the scold, but be thrilled that the Fed
has enough gumption to restore things to where the
game is more challenging, but the payoffs are still
meaningful.

Those who have developed a skill that allows them to
game the market will still make some decent money in
a singles and doubles game. Occasionally there will be
big wins. Just like there are home runs. But home runs
aren't commonplace. They weren't meant to be.

Sure this whole litany is sobering. If TheStreet.com were
corrupt there would be someone urging me not to write
this stuff for fear that it will hurt pageviews or unique
visitors. There would be someone saying "Where's the
Mr. Bullish that the advertisers want?" Or, "Way to go,
killjoy. Thanks for sending everyone to Forbes.com or
Motley Fool or CBS MarketWatch.com (MKTW: -
news - boards)."

To which I say, you readers have come to know me
better. I am out for only one thing, to help make you as
much money as possible. I can't do that right now. You
can't make me. Marty Peretz can't make me. Jeff
Berkowitz can't make me. The Trading Goddess can't
make me. Because I can't. Can't tell you if I can't. Been
around too long for that. Not worth faking it.

So we wait. Until the Fed is done. Until the buyers get
reliquefied. Until consumer spending cools. Until more
companies fail. Until there is more money building in the
system. We will scratch out some gains and make
some things happen. But only in the context of staying
in the game. That is a must. You won't know it has
turned if you don't stay in the game.

So much bad stuff has been written about me of late
that I can't bear to read the papers. But I know that I
have never wavered from my initial mission that Marty
and I set out on in 1996, to develop a product that levels
the playing field and gives you the same insights I had
when I started out, with much better tools and
information at your fingertips.

Recognizing when not to act is as important as knowing
when to act. Let the offline press continue to abuse me.
I don't give a darn. I want you in the game winning with
me, even if it means that for now, you lose interest. I am
confident that when things get better, the other guys,
the detractors who never helped you make a dime
anyway will be just as negative as they have always
been. And I will have done right by me and by you. That
will be our collective reward. That's what I write for.
That's what motivates me. That's why we have won and
will continue to win together.



To: Jenna who wrote (99770)5/27/2000 11:10:00 AM
From: DlphcOracl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
Jenna: Nice post. I think the last paragraph in your post is dead on. Investors have short memories and "greed" has not been eliminated from the investor's portfolio. I think this phase will occur later in the year than most people think, November/December rather than Sept./October, but it will be quite explosive. Other stocks worth considering to have positions when the techs return to favor are: PMCS, GLW, NTAP, and AMCC.



To: Jenna who wrote (99770)5/27/2000 1:10:00 PM
From: AF  Respond to of 120523
 
Consensus estimates in the TECHNOLOGY sector have increased 0.2% to $2.11 for 2000 and
1.1% to $1.41 for 2001. Expected annual earnings growth is 43.5% and 34.6% with revisions ratios
(# of estimates raised / # of estimates lowered) of 2.43 and 3.71 for 2000 and 2001, respectively. We
are seeing solid earnings results from the Software industry, with a 15.6% positive surprise, and
Semiconductors, at 6.3%.