SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (45480)5/27/2000 12:24:00 AM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Dan - in a case where the basic issues of fact and law are so contentious, it seems unlikely that the solicitor general would recommend going right to the supreme court. While there may be constitutional questions in this case, at the moment they are overshadowed by the rather dubious nature of the lower court proceedings, which would require appellate review. Even if the solicitor general recommends that course of action, I think it is highly unlikely that the Supreme Court would accept the case - they will want the additional clarification of appellate review first.



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (45480)5/27/2000 2:15:00 AM
From: The Duke of URL©  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Dan, Just out of pure curiousity, do you have a URL for more information on why Silberman recused himself? I was not following the case then. Oh, and by the way, why so grumpy?

You just haven't been your old jovial self ever since the Soviet Union collapsed. :)))


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News