Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Madden who wrote (1858)	5/27/2000 8:32:00 PM
From: Struggling Investor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1989

Thanks, Mark; also thank you so very much for your weekly pricing reports (think that was your work, anyway.) They represented a ton of work and were much appreciated. When I first read about the SNDK sales, I thought that SEG may be planning to use the proceeds to pay off debt. Anyway your look at it, I can't see how it would benefit current SEG stockholders. I've already voted "no" with my feet with 75% of our position, fully intend to vote "no" with the remaining 25%, and for the first time in my life look forward to hearing from a class-action attorney. Evidently, a "merger" (and I use the term very loosely) such as this is dictated by state laws, and there has been plenty of controversy before with Delaware state laws. I sincerely hope this one goes all the way to the Supreme Court. And, amen, brother on the tax issue - can you even believe the hypocrisy in their "realizing value for the shareholders by enabling a tax-free distribution of VRTS shrs" blah, blah, blah, as they laugh their way to the bank with give-away sales of SNDK. I really think I may hate those guys. thanks, again, Mark. trish