SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nealm who wrote (6451)5/27/2000 2:29:00 PM
From: chalu2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9127
 
What is "unreasonable" under the 4th Amendment is a matter of court interpretation and federal regs. The INS has broad powers that allow them to do what they did here. Do some more reading. If you don't like this--write your Congressman, and request a stricter interpretation, because ultimately that's what we're talking about.

By the way, remember this bit of heartening 4th amendment news from just a few years ago????:

February 7, 1995 - House Republicans Vote Down Fourth Amendment

During the debate today over the House Republicans' bill about the Exclusionary Rule, the House Black Caucus introduced an amendment to the bill that the Republicans promptly voted down. The amendment turned out to be the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, verbatim. The House Republicans were "chagrined." The vote was 303-121, meaning that a number of Democrats joined the Republicans.

Here's the Fourth Amendment:

Amendment Article 4
Right of Search and Seizure Regulated
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------