SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JDN who wrote (32396)5/28/2000 12:53:00 PM
From: techtonicbull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
JDN You are shouting and still reading Barrons. Stop reading it.

They are obviously effective in making you angry.

Not all investors are that stupid to follow a journalist blindly!



To: JDN who wrote (32396)5/28/2000 1:04:00 PM
From: QwikSand  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
BARRONS is starting to PISS ME OFF.

JDN: I mentioned the lead Barrons' column NOT because I think it actually predicts any problems for Sun. I specifically believe it does NOT predict any problems for Sun, given their backlog situation for the next several quarters. We all know that Sun's big issue now is to execute on new products and increase capacity to meet demand; to stair-step up to the next level in company size. These are real problems, but they're the kind of problems you want to have, and not much related to currencies.

But Barron's tries to stir things up. They make mountains out of molehills to sell papers. And they have one advantage: Sun only gets to state the truth once a quarter, but Barron's gets to state innuendo and bullsh*t every week and for better or worse their BS sometimes stirs things up.

I hope I'm wrong, but the only reason I mentioned that Barron's article is because it could mean some more volatility caused by momentum traders on Tuesday.

If all these folks who have called the Nasdaq bottom are right (which, by the way, I believe they are not), then it won't matter.

--QS



To: JDN who wrote (32396)5/28/2000 2:23:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Respond to of 64865
 
Hopefully Abelson will continue to be a contrarian indicator.