SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC (OTC:BB) - eConnect -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (10185)5/29/2000 1:20:00 AM
From: dkgross  Respond to of 18222
 
and I am personally glad to know you're here, pal.

:>)

dg



To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (10185)5/29/2000 2:19:00 AM
From: Mrs. Hoghead  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 18222
 
Ron, did you happen to catch my post on Anthony's thread? Surprisingly no one attacked me. I agree that their sanctamoniousness is revolting and insincere. We all know they could give a rats ass about scam busting unless it serves their purposes. I liken it to a bank robber who becomes a security consultant. It ain't that he cares about stopping bank robbery, he's just found a more socially acceptable way to take the bank's money. Anthony, Floydie, Pluvia, Bear Down, et al., behaved like jerks. But the IFR report, dessiminated by Manny as a representative of the company, Bloomberg as "impartial" reporters... that is what sucked in new investors in droves and gave the shorters the volume and height from which to operate. I'd never seen the game played before. They had. But can we really blame the shorters? So Anthony is a hypocrite and a grandstander who has had trouble with the law. Pluvia is some thin skinned antagonistic jerk who likes to gloat. Their gang of merry men came in and made a bundle of money, taunted all of us, kicked sand in our faces and left. We tied them to nefarious plots with IFR, the SEC, satan. The only bone I have to pick with them is the "saving the world" bs. I hate a hypocrite. I could respect them saying simply "we saw an opportunity to make money, we made it, and we're done." Fair enough. By their insults, taunts, arrogance, they got us personally vested in exposing their motivation. So we all know that they're not choir boys. We kinda like dredging up the facts that prove the point. But in the long term, they aren't the problem.

As for your loyalty to Manny and Tom, I hope its well placed because you seem like a principled and decent man. I appreciate your continued efforts. I've given up thinking life is fair, I commend you for trying to make it so. The only complaint I have is that you have yet to divulge your favorite song. You were gone when we subjected ourselves to public ridicule by revealing our poor musical taste, but now that you're back, I think its only fair that you fess up. Just to lighten the mood! Cheers!



To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (10185)5/29/2000 8:36:00 AM
From: chrsb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18222
 
Ron,

I don't know if you have been reading post to much, but Anthony and Pluvia had a little falling out, take a look at this thread-
Subject 34696
Its only a matter of time(IMHO)

Happy Trading,
Chris B



To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (10185)5/29/2000 10:45:00 PM
From: keeplookingup  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18222
 
Ron,

I appreciate your comments concerning the validity of ecnc. Based on what you said in message #10199 can we conclude that until, and if, we hear anything factual about ecnc we can conclude that they are a valid investment? Like many others I have been stuck with many shares that are supposed to support our daughter's college education, which is coming in 2 years. Please share your good information PLEASE. Thank you.

Keeplookingup



To: Ronald P. Margraf Sr. who wrote (10185)5/30/2000 12:11:00 PM
From: scoobypax  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18222
 
Ron,

I'm not making fun or being an arse, but I'd think that
someone with your stature (or perceived stature) would
take 2 secs to spell check. You mis-spell an awful lot.
I'm no scholar myself, but then, I'm of much lower stature.

And to answer your post, I'd say that if you DO have a
"sizeable" amount remaining in ECNC, would it not behoove
YOU to do the research you're asking us to challenge you to do? I don't understand.. And how much is "sizeable"?

Do you have more than $100k in ECNC?(current value)