Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oak Tree who wrote (67281)	5/29/2000 3:35:00 PM
From: jbe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

In my view, it is KP that is undervalued, not EEX. KP has actually been making a profit, with per-share earnings of 85 cents, but has a p/e of only 17.85. EEX is not making a profit currently, andhasn't made one for at least the past five years; earnings per share are negative -- minus $1.75 -- and hence it also has a negative p/e. Just how do you value a company that is not profitable? And how can you call it undervalued? EDIT: P,S. You might be interested in the grades Morningstar gives to these two stocks. Illuminating, IMO. quicktake.morningstar.com quicktake.morningstar.com