Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (113236)	5/29/2000 5:10:00 PM
From: Mani1	Respond to of 1573690

Ted Ted Re <<.....a 4 to 1 usually kills a stock....an example is QCOM.>> Or RMBS. I disagree though, QCOM is down to all evaluation and all the China stuff. NOK is doing OK after a 4 for 1. If it was my choice I would not have any split. I like high EPS numbers. I am in the camp thinking stock splits mean zero one way or the other. Mani

To: tejek who wrote (113236)	5/29/2000 5:41:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573690

Ted, The benefits of the average 2 to 1 split have been overrated.....a 4 to 1 usually kills a stock....an example is QCOM....at the beginning of the year was at 200 post split, now 66. Well, AMD will have the earnings to support the increased number of issued shares. Pravin. PS: I bought a couple thousand shares of QCOM on Friday at $63.5. I expect to sell them this week for $75.