SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGR who wrote (36599)5/30/2000 11:26:00 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42523
 
<I thought that the general consensus on this thread was that QCOM is fairly valued at -123.98!?>

No, look at my profile... I've owned it since before ERICY.

DAK



To: BGR who wrote (36599)5/30/2000 11:45:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
If that's what you think, you think wrong. No one in their right mind would assign a negative value to a company with a positive cash flow. You need to learn how to value stocks, methinks. You don't learn how to do that by investing in indexes.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News