Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (51335)	5/31/2000 10:04:00 AM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

Actually I think highly of Dan Niles. But does he really move a stock ? Yesterday on Digital Jam (sat tv) he said he was like a "weather man". A weather man tells about the rain, but a weather man can not make it rain. But Hal cann't read, so what Dan Niles says doesn't mean a thing. By the way, did you see hal's first two trades have been closed out today with profits. Visit my web site tonight ! Click on my name to get there. Larry Dudash

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (51335)	5/31/2000 3:15:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53903

jhg, most folks on this thread are negative for 1 single reason. mu has not had net positive cash flow since it went public. their debt has skyrocketed - thank goodness they converted that debt to shares and diluted their company. expect billions more in debt to be forthcoming over the next several years. the analysts tout this stock to no end - and for no reason. dram prices drop for 4 months - not a peep. prices rebound for a week and the tout-a-thon commences. commodity industry. money losing company - even after windfall profits. manipulative management and analysts. play mu if YOU know what you are doing. otherwise, stay away. this may be the MOST MANIPULATED stock on wall street.

To: jhg_in_kc who wrote (51335)	5/31/2000 6:23:00 PM
From: Ronald J. Clark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

Quadruple from here? How much money has MU made in the last 5 years? Isn't MU involved in a cyclical business where it's PE multiple ought probably be applied to "normalized" earnings or at least some very low multiple of "peak" earnings? I have to admit that I just don't get it! What does Dan Niles say supports a $280 share price for MU?