Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alexandermf who wrote (19822)	5/31/2000 2:46:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

I would hate to have my personal phone conversations recorded especially if I was talking about breaking the law. Ms. Tripp started recording her personal phone conversations when Ms. Lewinski tried to involve her in a criminal conspiracy to provide false information to a court in a civil case. I believe in our "Rights to Privacy" and if I had time I could make a good case for Clintons Rights that were violated, You know as an Attorney ..it works both ways..

To: Alexandermf who wrote (19822)	5/31/2000 2:57:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

>>Tapeing a Phone Conversation is a federal offense' No, it isn't so long as one party knows of it. And, of course, if there's a court order. btw, Mark Levin of Landmark Legal stated that the reason Maryland has the all party rule is that Maryland is an unusually corrupt state and its corrupt politicians didn't want taping of themselves w/o their knowledge. That's almost a word for word quote.