Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (80534)	5/31/2000 4:42:00 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 108807

Not at all. Back it up. Neo says I am not as honest as most people- maybe- with that proviso about nastiness. And does it MATTER if I am dishonest in the service of nastiness? And E-bill, I'm not sure what he is saying. I AM sometimes dishonest- but am I less dishonest than most people? Anyway, you guys will have to find another nasty girl I really have to go.

To: jlallen who wrote (80534)	6/1/2000 4:42:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

O.K., I've had enough and I'm rather sorry that I was not at home late this afternoon to pipe up while this brouhaha was ongoing. X does not need a defender--she's more than capable of taking on all comers. Still I am stepping in to say that although X may be disingenuous at times in argument, she is not ever dishonest intentionally to my knowledge after being here for about a year and a half. To say that she is is simply off base. You may not like her and she may not like you; these are personal reactions to which everyone is entitled. I don't know if she likes dealing with me on this thread, nor do I particularly care. I will say that I have found her to be unsparingly honest. X loathes losing an argument--don't we all? I repeat, don't we all? And she'll scrabble around at times to try to save her position in an argument. So what? If this is dishonesty, then we all stand guilty as charged.