SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles Tutt who wrote (45751)5/31/2000 11:43:00 PM
From: rudedog  Respond to of 74651
 
Charles - I think Jackson's attitude was impacted by the earlier consent decree. You have to remember he has been dealing with MSFT for a long time, not just the current case. He didn't come to this case with no history.

I can imagine that dealing with MSFT arrogance would try the patience of a saint, but judges are supposed to remain neutral. I don't think Jackson managed that this time, although I thought his work on the earlier consent decree was pretty good.



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (45751)6/1/2000 2:13:00 AM
From: TTOSBT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Re: "Jackson may have developed some opinions over the course of the trial based on the evidence he heard (that's his job, after all)."

And so now he will render penalties based on evidence he chose not to hear!
(that's an oversight of his job, after all).

TTOSBT


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News