Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (72968)	6/1/2000 7:37:00 AM
From: Jimbo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Gregory - can you give us some specifics on your valuation model ? What is it based on future past revenues, projected royalties ? Thanks !

To: Boplicity who wrote (72968)	6/2/2000 3:10:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Canary, <...many zero would have to be added to what I own now to bring it back to where it was a few short months ago. If the stock drops into the 50's I will put more meaningful money to work, but I'll never have has much as I did at one time.> So you think Alan Green$pan doesn't have to worry about the Wealth Effect any more? You think the SUV order books have emptied over the past month or two with the double whammy of gasoline and share prices? No more interest rate increases? How about the psychological effect, "Sudden Wealth Syndrome" which had people running to their shrinks and psychologists to help them with their changed lives, even depression, because of all the wealth they suddenly had to deal with, understand and the changes in friends, living place, quitting work - all sorts of problematic issues? Cruising by, Mqurice