Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Venkie who wrote (36997)	6/1/2000 12:59:00 PM
From: Grandk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

Yep. Which is why I havn't sold or covered. I expect a large melt up or down in the ST. On a side note: How can you justify VRSN, with a market cap of 17 billion on revenue of 100 million? A P2S ratio of 150, and next year's eps is .31c. Unbelievable. I don't see how anyone can consider these stocks 'buys' at these levels.

To: Venkie who wrote (36997)	6/1/2000 11:51:00 PM
From: marginmike	Respond to of 42523

Yah SLOW growth Yippie, I hear thats great for increasing earnings!!!!!! NOT! Venkie Slow growth and moderate inflation is your best case scenario, now instead of telling us why Naz goes to 4K, explain how that scenario will help equity prices..................................................................................Done? Yep your right it doest help them and with techs tradding on strong growth projections they have a lot of exposure. We rally into JULY then kiss your a$$$ goodbye. JMHO DA BEARS!