SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (113698)6/1/2000 2:13:00 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574263
 
TWY...Re..<<<<< Even if these rumors are true, I would say these 1.5GHz parts are without regard to guard band. A 1.5GHz raw Fmax part would ship at 1.3GHz(at best) Think minimum 12% guard band and 100MHz incremental bin spits. The expectations on this thread are perhaps a bit too high.<<<<<<<

TWY, what our expectations are or what really happens is immaterial to this argument. Charles conceded in his initial argument that 1.5 ghz could ship now in limited quantities. The question is, if AMD can ship 1.5 ghz in limited quantities, should they, or should AMD introduce the lower speed grade, such as a 1 ghz or 1.1 ghz and go up from there. Charles favored the slow but sure. I favor the wow factor. Nobody is saying here that AMD should intro a 1.5 ghz if they don't have any available.



To: THE WATSONYOUTH who wrote (113698)6/1/2000 5:35:00 PM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574263
 
TWY,

<Even if these rumors are true, I would say these 1.5GHz parts are without regard to guard band. A 1.5GHz raw Fmax part would ship at 1.3GHz(at best) Think minimum 12% guard band and 100MHz incremental bin spits. The expectations on this thread are perhaps a bit too high.>

I am glad you posted this. Somehow, anything less than 1.5G today is being seen as a set back at Dresden. This is nuts!

Chuck